The Filibuster


Earlier this week, MLB was making a big deal out of David Wright being just a homerun shy of hitting for the cycle. Was this just a marketing ploy to get more people to watch the game or is hitting for the cycle really that big of a deal?  In other words, is it really an achievement of great baseball prowess or is it just a silly coincidence that happens to be somewhat interesting? Keep in mind that guys like César Tovar, Vic Wertz and Randy Hundley (hardly household names) have hit for the cycle, yet no one seems to care.

–Jeff

                                                                                        

Interesting question, Mr. Lung. And I must say, I’m of two minds on this. First of all, if a guy is able to pick up 4 hits in a nine inning game, that’s pretty good. And if three of the four are four extra bases, that’s even better. I only wish the Tigers could start doing that on a regular basis. And I’m talking as a team here, not just any individual player.

However, I have to say, and I’m sure you agree with me here, that hitting for the cycle is in and of itself nothing more than a fluke. Why should we care more about a guy who gets a single, double, triple and homerun in one game than we should about a guy who hits four homers in a game? The simple answer is that we shouldn’t.

Now, I understand that as the salaries of ballplayers continue to rise and as parks are charging more and more outrageous prices, MLB wants to get it’s cut and that means getting more people interested. Sometimes that means hyping something that really isn’t that big of a deal. And why not pick something that has a somewhat esoteric name like, “The Cycle?” I respect that.

But any true baseball fan can see through the hype and pick out what’s behind MLB’s ploy. It’s money, pure and simple. And this brings me to something even more important than Reyes and Wright and their ball-thumping theatrics.

longoria.jpg

This past week we saw Evan Longoria, the Rays
soon-to-be-star third baseman, sign a long term contract for less than he
probably could have gotten if he waited for free agency. And he also waived his
arbitration rights. Now, I know that some members of the player’s union are up
in arms over this move but I like it. I think baseball players deserve what
they get paid (although this is a topic for another time) but I also think that
the situation needs to be pulled back into shape. The line between team loyalty
and getting what you deserve has been distorted in the last few seasons and
something had to be done in order to bring it back into somewhat of a stasis.
Longoria’s contract, although it’s just a small part of the trend, could help
with this correction. And to be completely honest with you, I think that when
the average fan sees a ballplayer acting like an average guy instead of a prima
donna, that’s going to be the best marketing MLB could have asked for.

-A

5 Comments

Well spoken. I could reallly care less if someone gets the cycle, unless it adds fantasy points to my team or the team that I am facing…

I’m sad that there was no mention of Cesar Tovar, Vic Wertz or Randy Hundley even though I handed you those gems on a silver platter. But for once, yeah, I kinda agree with you on all points. I like the Longoria deal. Don’t really care about the cycle. Still sad there was no mention of Tovar, Wertz or Hundley. Randy Hundley dude! Come on!!

–Jeff

Conor Jackson needed a double to hit for the cycle earlier this week, but stretched it into a triple. So I don’t know how many actual cycles are “genuine” anyway. On the subject of salaries the most annoying thing to hear is that a player is “playing for a contract”. Firstly, is it true that he didn’t really try as hard prior to his final year,and secondly, why would anyone sign a player who did such a thing?

Excellent post.
.
I think mid and small market teams realize it makes sense to identify and sign up their young studs to avoid (or postpone) rising free agency costs. I’m not sure players are demonstrating more loyalty by accepting these offers though. Risk is essentially being transferred from the player to the club, which is worth something to a young player. I agree fans will perceive this as player loyalty, but it’s still a purely economic decision – on both sides.
.
Great call on the cycle having its roots in money. Reminds me of the time AZ made a huge song and dance over Luis Gonzalez joining Babe Ruth and a dozen other HOFers in the “300 homer, 500 doubles Club”, contrived just for that occasion.
.
Just my opinion, but if someone GIVES you Cesar Tovar, it’s pretty rude not to take it. I mean, it’s Cesar **ckin’ Tovar!

For real, Tovar… I mean, seriously, Al. Never mind that 800 lb gorilla in the room. Jeesh.

And good for Connor. Screw the double if you can get three.

–Jeff

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 66 other followers

%d bloggers like this: